Should I buy a Jupiter 80 in 2017?

Forum for JUPITER-80
SoundReverend
Posts: 38
Joined: 11:43, 5 September 2016

Re: Should I buy a Jupiter 80 in 2017?

Post by SoundReverend »

Synthtron wrote: I use the Jupiter-80 as my main controller in my studio at the moment and the Jupiter-50 is used in my live rig. One thing that was mentioned is that the Jupiter-80 has 4 parts MIDI BUT to me not being able to turn off those MIDI channels is very, very ANNOYING.
The Jupiter-80/50 I believe are best suited for live performance and I think that was Roland's intention
.
I just read that. Actually you can turn off the MIDI channels. Normally each Part has one channel 1-4 and if you deactivate one the MIDI channel is off as well. But if you go to the External Part settings and activate e.g. the first MIDI channel, then it does not matter if you have one, all or no parts activated, it will always play with that external part MIDI channel.
Rodan
Posts: 486
Joined: 14:33, 10 June 2006
Location: San Diego, USA

Re: Should I buy a Jupiter 80 in 2017?

Post by Rodan »

SoundReverend wrote: Actually you can turn off the MIDI channels. Normally each Part has one channel 1-4 and if you deactivate one the MIDI channel is off as well. But if you go to the External Part settings and activate e.g. the first MIDI channel, then it does not matter if you have one, all or no parts activated, it will always play with that external part MIDI channel.
Interesting. Thanks, SoundReverend.
User avatar
CesarsoundOne
Posts: 203
Joined: 21:29, 9 October 2014

Re: Should I buy a Jupiter 80 in 2017?

Post by CesarsoundOne »

Now you should I buy a Jupiter 80 in 2018.
Devnor
Posts: 696
Joined: 20:22, 27 September 2010

Re: Should I buy a Jupiter 80 in 2017?

Post by Devnor »

Yes
Synthtron
Posts: 690
Joined: 16:24, 26 November 2011
Location: USA-East Coast
Contact:

Re: Should I buy a Jupiter 80 in 2017?

Post by Synthtron »

SoundReverend wrote:
Synthtron wrote: I use the Jupiter-80 as my main controller in my studio at the moment and the Jupiter-50 is used in my live rig. One thing that was mentioned is that the Jupiter-80 has 4 parts MIDI BUT to me not being able to turn off those MIDI channels is very, very ANNOYING.
The Jupiter-80/50 I believe are best suited for live performance and I think that was Roland's intention
.
I just read that. Actually you can turn off the MIDI channels. Normally each Part has one channel 1-4 and if you deactivate one the MIDI channel is off as well. But if you go to the External Part settings and activate e.g. the first MIDI channel, then it does not matter if you have one, all or no parts activated, it will always play with that external part MIDI channel.
Thanks for the info.
If you deactivate a Part via the panel's Part On and Off switch that does not affect MIDI On/Off.
I will have to sort out what you are talking about here. I have to find the External Parts setting because there is no way to turn on/off MIDI Channels in the System MIDI Screen.
SoundReverend
Posts: 38
Joined: 11:43, 5 September 2016

Re: Should I buy a Jupiter 80 in 2017?

Post by SoundReverend »

It is part of the registration settings, in the manual "Enabling the External Part Settings"

"... In the Registration External Part screen (p 31), set the MIDI out Setting to “EXTERNAL ”

If the MIDI Out Setting is set to INTERNAL, Parts that are turned on will transmit MIDI messages.
Choose the INTERNAL setting if you want a Part’s performance data to be recorded on a MIDI sequencer, or if you want to control the JUPITER-80 from a MIDI sequencer.
• The MIDI channel of each Part is speci ed by the system parameter “Part Channel” (p. 85)."
Synthtron
Posts: 690
Joined: 16:24, 26 November 2011
Location: USA-East Coast
Contact:

Re: Should I buy a Jupiter 80 in 2017?

Post by Synthtron »

SoundReverend wrote:It is part of the registration settings, in the manual "Enabling the External Part Settings"

"... In the Registration External Part screen (p 31), set the MIDI out Setting to “EXTERNAL ”

If the MIDI Out Setting is set to INTERNAL, Parts that are turned on will transmit MIDI messages.
Choose the INTERNAL setting if you want a Part’s performance data to be recorded on a MIDI sequencer, or if you want to control the JUPITER-80 from a MIDI sequencer.
• The MIDI channel of each Part is specified by the system parameter “Part Channel” (p. 85)."

OK yes, I understand that.
What I was referring to is turning off the Jupiter-80's internal synth engine's MIDI channels. If I am playing back a sequence with another completely different synthesizer on say MIDI Channel 1 and I do not want the Jupiter-80's Part Receiving MIDI on that channel but want it off. You cannot turn off the Jupiter-80's internal synth MIDI channel. You can change the MIDI channel to different MIDI channel but that is it, which stinks when you have let's say 15 MIDI channels used for other synths besides the Jupiter-80 and only want the Jupiter-80 (just one Part) to respond to one MIDI channel and have the rest of the other parts MIDI receive channels off.
SoundReverend
Posts: 38
Joined: 11:43, 5 September 2016

Re: Should I buy a Jupiter 80 in 2017?

Post by SoundReverend »

Understood. I don't have this issue because I use the USB MIDI from the JP80 and so I always have to select this in my DAW if I want to play a sound. What I like about that is exactly that you can play a sound on the JP80 that even when the part is turned off so it won't play from the JP80 keyboard.
User avatar
richardbates1
Posts: 389
Joined: 19:58, 19 July 2013

Re: Should I buy a Jupiter 80 in 2017?

Post by richardbates1 »

I just sold my Jupiter 80 that was in perfect condition, I hated to part with it but I really wanted the RD2000. I loved the JP80, but I just really love the RD2000! The sound is great and keys feel absolutely wonderful. For some reason I feel the sound is richer on the RD2000 even though it has the same supernatural sound engine on the synth side of the board. I think it might be the newer D/A converters and the synth engine of the Jupiter 80 is over 10 years old? I don't know what improvements that have been made since but you would think that there have been improvements over a decade of time? The thing I miss the most is the acoustic section on the JP80.
Post Reply