SH32 An analog treasure

Forum for SH-1, SH-2, SH-09, SH-101 and other SH synthesizers from 1970-1980's

SH32 An analog treasure

Postby Studio5397 » 09:50, 29 July 2011

I record extensively and have some of the best soft synths out there. I also have the Roland Fantom and RD700SX sounds along with my Triton Rack and Motif ES. However, when I want a synth to POP in the track, I go to my SH32. Something about the sonic architecture make this thing sound smooth and defined in the mix.
Posts: 4
Joined: 08:52, 29 July 2011

Re: SH32 An analog treasure

Postby pocklefo » 21:44, 10 August 2011

I agree, a very underrated little synth that seems to have a unique sound of it's own.
I'd like to compare it to the JP-8000 some day to see if the modeled oscillators make that much difference , considering the extra S/H price.
Posts: 8
Joined: 19:15, 12 September 2006
Location: United Kingdom

Re: SH32 An analog treasure

Postby Mr Arkadin » 12:45, 14 August 2011

You do realise the SH-32 isn't analogue, right?
Mr Arkadin
Posts: 15
Joined: 19:26, 17 November 2008

Re: SH32 An analog treasure

Postby Andy Keys » 09:56, 14 September 2011

I love mine. It's one of my favourite synths.
User avatar
Andy Keys
Posts: 1743
Joined: 13:44, 7 August 2007
Location: UK

Re: SH32 An analog treasure

Postby Venn Diagram » 14:59, 5 August 2014

Sure we know it isn't Analog.
It still does superb strings, pads, effects and the like with plenty of character.
I am impressed by how well it complements my Elektron gear (especially the Analog Four and the Monomachine) and sounds nothing like the VA in the Integra-7.
It has a certain grit and warmth but I am more partial to the 12db per octave filter than the 24db filter slope for some strange reason.
Venn Diagram
Posts: 71
Joined: 16:59, 25 August 2013
Location: Toronto, Canada

Re: SH32 An analog treasure

Postby realtrance » 19:34, 27 August 2016

I remember getting mine when it launched, in red, white and blue colors, not long after the 9/11 attacks.

Felt sorry for Roland, as no-one was inspired by anything for awhile after that.

I thought it was an amazing synth, including great fx, and a really punchy sound. There was a lot of whingeing at the time about it not being analogue, or even physically modeled like the JP-8000, notable because of limitations typical of digital waveforms. The "WASG" mysterious marketing (this is one area in the west where Roland has been horrible for a long time) didn't help.

None of it mattered to me then, nor does it now; it is indeed a treasure. Analogue, digital, honestly, who cares any more? :)
Posts: 122
Joined: 16:39, 8 April 2005

Return to SH series

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest