PCMS Diff between A-B-C Samples

Forum for Integra 7
JunoJohn
Posts: 815
Joined: 08:29, 24 February 2008
Location: Washington DC

Re: PCMS Diff between A-B-C Samples

Post by JunoJohn »

PauloF wrote:Great explanation (as always) JunoJohn!!
Thanks!
JunoJohn wrote:There is no overlap between mappings B and C.
I probably should have answered the obvious question:

What's the point of all this?

By creating two different mappings, Roland has effectively turned one multisampled waveform into two.

And, why is that useful?

As Watermelon mentioned, you can create a stereo sound by panning Waveform B to one side and Waveform C to the other.

Creating a stereo sound would be a problem if you only had Waveform A with which to work.

You can also thicken a sound by layering and detuning Waveforms B and C. (This also helps to hide any obvious loop points.)

If you layer and detune two copies of just Waveform A, you would likely have issues with phase cancellation.
JunoJohn
Posts: 815
Joined: 08:29, 24 February 2008
Location: Washington DC

…and in the SuperNatural Synth…

Post by JunoJohn »

Some of the PCM Waveforms in the SuperNatural Synth also use the A-B-C technique.

Unfortunately, they are labeled 1-2-3. That's the same way that Roland labels unrelated Waveforms, such as all of those "SynStrings" ones.

You might wish to listen to them to determine which is which.
Post Reply