Synthtron wrote:richardbates1 wrote:Synthtron wrote:I also really want to see how the JU-06 and the JX-03 sound compared to the real deals that I do have so I have decided to get those as well but only one K-25m.
Here is a great video showing comparisons between the JX3P and the JX-03, the Juno 106 and the JU-06
It starts at 24:52
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZArcYT3Nvck
Thanks for sharing, I took a listen. Some of the patches sound pretty close if not identical but interesting how some do not sound as close. In some sounds there is a definate difference. Some of the comparisons sound brighter or darker. The Chorus noise is pretty loud on their original synths seem louder than on my JX-3p and Juno-106. Maybe that is because of some kind of compression or sound processing?
I will get them within the month and to try them and tweak 'em myself. I am curious if the filters were adjusted a bit on either synth to get closer. The Boutiques so far have alot of the same characteristc of the originals. IMO these are by far closer emulations than the Jupiter-80 comparisons that Scott Tibbs demonstrated a few years ago.
I agree these synth emulations sound so much closer to the actual originals than the JP80.
The Jupiter 80 is it's own synth, with it's own sound quality. The Jupiter 80 VA section sounds a bit more digital and lacks the analog quality that I think these Boutique synths capture.
I am a believer in the ACB technology, it really sounds so close to the originals!
With the Jupiter 80 VA section you were trying to create sounds that were close to the Jupiter 8 based on the Jupiter 80 structure which most times never matched up per control.
But with the JP-08 you are creating sounds based on the really, really close emulation of sound and structure of the actual Jupiter 8 synth, from ground up so no matter what sound you create with the JP-08 it has the sound that the Jupiter 8 had, the same holds true to the Juno and the JX3P emulations. At least I think?